Skip to main content
· 4/19/2006

Loidl v. I & E GROUP, INC.

Citations

  • 927 So. 2d 1016
  • 2006 WL 1098275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that certiorari is the proper means to challenge an order discharging a lis pendens
  • holding that certiorari, rather than appeal, is the proper mechanism to challenge an order discharging a lis pendens
  • discussing why certiorari review is the proper method to review order discharging lis pendens
  • “The notice is ... a cloud on the title that creates a priority for the party that filed the lis pendens if that party prevails in the pending litigation.”
  • “[I]t is not an order which directs or precludes the party from taking a certain action outside of the lawsuit. Therefore, it is not properly appealed under rule 9.130(a)(3)(B).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Altenbernd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.