Loho v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in light of the adverse credibility finding, the evidence was insufficient to compel a finding of past persecution or well-founded fear of future persecution
• holding that evidence that the petitioner voluntarily returned to her home country and “took minimal steps to investigate the availability of some means of avoiding a return to the country she claim[ed] to have feared,” supported an adverse credibility finding
• stating that a petitioner’s “history of willingly returning to his or her home country militates against a finding of . . . a well-founded fear of future persecution”
• holding that such an inference is warranted
• explaining how a voluntary return to a home country adversely affects an asylum application
• “[A]n alien’s history of willingly returning to his or her home country militates against a finding of past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).