Lohnes v. Level 3 Communications, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the required sanction in the ordinary case [for a late disclosure in violation of Rule 37] is mandatory preclusion”
• holding that “[t]his is exactly the type of unfair tactical advantage that the disclosure rules were designed to eradicate.”
• holding that “[tjhis is exactly the type of unfair tactical advantage that the disclosure rules were designed to eradicate.”
• explaining that the district court must take the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party and indulge it all reasonable inferences
• noting that Rule 37(c)(1) “places a burden on the objecting party to move for preclusion”
• noting that Rule 37(c)(1) “places a burden on the objecting party to move for preclusion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).