Logue v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a court presiding over the retrial of a defendant who had been granted a new trial properly refused to rehear a motion to suppress evidence that was denied prior to the first trial
• a court presiding over the retrial of a defendant who had been granted a new trial properly refused to rehear a motion to suppress evidence that was denied prior to the first trial
• addressing Rule 729(g)(2), the predecessor to Rule 4-252(h)(2)
• “When such a motion has been fully heard and considered and there is not new evidence which was unavailable at the first hearing, the trial court may exercise his discretion and bind himself by the prior ruling whether the proceeding is in the original trial or a new trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).