Logue v. Logano Trucking Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘More than the mere possibility of litigation must be evident’ for materials to be considered immune from discovery under the work-product doctrine.”
• “The Court finds that sanctions are appropriate. . . . The Young firm could not 23 have believed in good faith that its asserted privileges were valid.”
• “More than the mere possibility of litigation must be evident for 3 materials to be considered immune from discovery under the work-product doctrine.” 4 (citation and internal quotations omitted)
• “More than the mere possibility of litigation must be evident for materials to be considered immune from discovery under the work-product doctrine.” (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Detection Sys., Inc. v. Pittway Corp., 96 F.R.D. 152, 155 (W.D.N.Y. 1982)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).