LOGRASSO, MICHAEL J. v. CITY OF TONAWANDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when the documents relied upon “contradict [the] allegations in the complaint,” the documents “control”
• concluding that the use of “may” does not “water[] down the degree of necessity” required
• holding that if a housing provider’s offered alternative accommodation provides a disabled person with an equal housing opportunity, it need not also grant the requested accommodation
• holding that when 5 No similar allegations are made against the Virtua Board. the documents relied upon “contradict [the] allegations in the complaint,” the documents “control”
• concluding that amendment would be futile where the plaintiff-appellant “had already amended her complaint once and did not move to amend again or suggest what she might add”
• concluding that amendment would be futile where the plaintiff-appellant “had already amended her complaint once and did not move to amend again or suggest what she might add”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).