Skip to main content

Loggins v. State

Citations

  • 910 So. 2d 146
  • 2005 WL 563988

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that postjudgment motions are permissible in Rule 32 proceedings but holding that a circuit court retains jurisdiction to modify a judgment in Rule 32 proceedings for only 30 days after the judgment is entered
  • recognizing that postjudgment motions are permissible in Rule 32 proceedings but holding that a circuit court retains jurisdiction to modify a judgment in Rule 32 proceedings for only 30 days after the judgment is entered
  • recognizing that a motion to reconsider is a valid postjudgment motion in the Rule 32 context but that a circuit court retains jurisdiction to modify a judgment in Rule 32 proceedings for only 30 days after the judgment is entered
  • recognizing a motion to reconsider as a valid postjudgment motion in the Rule 32 context
  • \It is well settled that a circuit court generally retains jurisdiction to modify a judgment for ... 30 days after the judgment is entered.\
  • \It is well settled that a circuit court generally retains jurisdiction to modify a judgment for ... 30 days after the judgment is entered.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.