Logan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting it was “inconceivable that the appellant, who had the advice of counsel and to whom the entire indictment had just been read immediately preceding the admonishment, could have been misled or prejudiced in any way”
• noting it was “inconceivable that the appellant, who had the advice of counsel and to whom the entire indictment had just been read immediately preceding the admonishment, could have been misled or prejudiced in any way”
• noting it was “inconceivable that the appellant, who had the advice of counsel and to whom the entire indictment had just been read immediately preceding the admonishment, could have been misled or prejudiced in any way”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Garcia v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1994-05-12· cited 30×
• Donald Stevenson v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2014-07-17
• Harris, Cedric v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2013-01-31