Logan v. State

Citations

• 58 Fla. 72

Syllabus

<p>1. Where testimony does not appear to be relevant and its relevancy is not shown by the party offering it, there is no error in excluding it.</p> <p>2. Where, the evidence is conflicting, but there is some testimony upon which the verdict can be legally predicated and it has been approved by the trial court in denying a motion for new trial, the verdict will not be disturbed by the appellate court.</p>