· 12/16/1982
Logan v. Patton
Citations
- 70 Pa. Commw. 399
- 453 A.2d 369
- 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1759
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the petitioner had forfeited a particular argument by failing to develop the argument “specifically and distinctly” in his opening brief
- holding that issues not “specifically and distinctly” argued in a party’s opening brief are forfeited
- holding that an issue is waived if it is not “specifically and distinctly” argued in the opening brief
- holding that an issue not “specifically and distinctly” argued in the opening brief is forfeited
- holding that the Court “need not address” issues that the petitioner did not “specifically and distinctly” argue in his opening brief
- holding that issues not “specifically and distinctly” argued in an opening brief may be deemed waived
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Craig, MacPhail, Rogers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.