Skip to main content
· 12/16/1982

Logan v. Patton

Citations

  • 70 Pa. Commw. 399
  • 453 A.2d 369
  • 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the petitioner had forfeited a particular argument by failing to develop the argument “specifically and distinctly” in his opening brief
  • holding that issues not “specifically and distinctly” argued in a party’s opening brief are forfeited
  • holding that an issue is waived if it is not “specifically and distinctly” argued in the opening brief
  • holding that an issue not “specifically and distinctly” argued in the opening brief is forfeited
  • holding that the Court “need not address” issues that the petitioner did not “specifically and distinctly” argue in his opening brief
  • holding that issues not “specifically and distinctly” argued in an opening brief may be deemed waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Craig, MacPhail, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.