Skip to main content
· 5/18/1891

Logan v. Gardner

Citations

  • 142 Pa. 442
  • 21 A. 1083
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 756

Syllabus

<p>Upon the question whether the plaintiff had knowledge of improvements and expenditures made by defendants’ predecessors in title, so as to be thereafter estopped by her silence, evidence of her presence in sight of the premises while the improvements were being made, was sufficient, under the circumstances of the ease, for submission to the jury.</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.