Logan v. Com.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s factual finding that an officer did not act in bad faith was a credibility finding that was binding on appeal unless plainly wrong or without evidence to support it
• noting that, “in the civil context,” bad faith “connotes the ‘conscious doing of a wrong’” (citation omitted)
• stating that findings relating to bad faith “are binding upon appeal unless they are plainly wrong or without evidence to support them”
• stating that findings relating to bad faith “are binding upon appeal unless they are plainly wrong or without evidence to support them”
• implementing such an approach, while defining “bad faith” as directed to scenarios in which “the search was motivated by bias, personal animus, a desire to harass, a conscious intent to circumvent the law, or a similar improper motive”
• implementing such an approach, while defining “bad faith” as directed to scenarios in which “the search was motivated by bias, personal animus, a desire to harass, a conscious intent to circumvent the law, or a similar improper motive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).