Logan M. Dull v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases on this principle and reversing a restitution order based partially on uncharged conduct where defendant did not agree to pay a greater amount
• court abused its discretion by ordering Dull to pay for more checks than those written during the timeframe he agreed to pay
• “Because Dull did not plead guilty to committing theft of Beshears’s grain prior to the summer of 2013 and because he did not agree to pay restitution for grain sold prior to that time period, the trial court abused its discretion by ordering him to do so.”
• “Because Dull did not plead guilty to committing theft of Beshears’s grain prior to the summer of 2013 and because he did not agree to pay restitution for grain sold pri- or to that time period, the trial court abused its discretion by ordering him to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).