LOGAN ETIENNE v. STATE OF FLORIDA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs’ mere collective belief was insufficient to prove that race was the true reason for disparate treatment
• clarifying that hearsay evidence is permissible at sentencing so long as the overall record, not just the hearsay evidence itself, provides adequate indicia of reliability
• \[P]ractices which deter qualified minorities from applying for jobs impermissibly taint[ ] any analysis which employs the use of actual applicant-flow data.\
• “Where the unresolved issues are primarily legal rather 27 28 Defamation (against Pasek); and (8) Violation of 42 USC § 1983 (against Defendant White Pine County. (ECF No. 55.
• noting elements of Title VII and § 1981 are identical
• same for both hiring and promotion decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).