Logan Equipment Corp. v. Profile Construction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Logan Equipment Corporation could not maintain a lien because it simply leased excavation equipment, rather than “do[ing] work or furnish[ing] materials in accordance with [Rhode Island’s mechanics’ lien law]”
• holding that Logan Equipment Corporation could not maintain a lien because it simply leased excavation equipment, rather than “do[ing] work or furnish[ing] materials in accordance with [Rhode Island’s mechanics’ lien law]”
• asserting that Tennessee is alone in its classification of rental equipment as materials
• defendant must demonstrate that there is a substantial likelihood that, had the claim been raised, the outcome of the case would have been different

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).