Skip to main content
· 12/21/1992

Loewer v. National Bank

Citations

  • 311 Ark. 354
  • 844 S.W.2d 329
  • 1992 Ark. LEXIS 748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s disobedience cannot have been knowing and wilful if officer has not made clear to defendant that he or she was compelled to obey
  • holding that defendant’s disobedience cannot have been knowing and wilful if officer has not made clear to defendant that he or she was compelled to obey
  • holding that by requesting appellant to “come here for a second,” the officer failed to “use[ ] language or tone of voice indicating compliance with [his] request might be compelled”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newbern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.