Loewen Group International, Incorporated v. William J. Haberichter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “This section provides federal court jurisdiction over controversies involving collective bargaining agreements and also authorizes federal courts to fashion a body of federal law for the enforcement of those agreements.”
• “This section provides federal court jurisdiction over controversies involving collective bargaining agreements and also authorizes federal courts to fashion a body of federal láw for the enforcement of those agreements.”
• “This section provides federal court jurisdiction over controversies involving collective bargaining agreements and also authorizes federal courts to fashion a body of federal law for the enforcement of those agreements.”
• if examining collective bargaining agreement to determine if conflict existed constituted interpretation for preemption purposes, doctrine would “swallow rule that employees ... are entitled to assert legal rights independent of that rule” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).