Loekle v. Hansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding speech not protected by LMRDA because “there is no constitutional value in false statements of fact. . . . [T]he interest in making such knowingly misleading statements . . . is limited indeed and not entitled to full free speech protection.”
• plaintiff can show bias through instances of \specific prejudice or a high probability of actual bias on the part of at least some members of the tribunal\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).