Skip to main content
· 10/22/1996

Loehrer v. Mcdonnell Douglas Corporation

Citations

  • 98 F.3d 1056
  • 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 161
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 27385

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “the employer bears the burden of proving the existence of conditions giving rise to the exception”
  • noting that “a company will be excused from WARN liability if, when confronted with potentially devastating occurrences, it reacts as would reasonable employers within its own market”
  • noting that “a company will be excused from WARN liability if, when confronted with potentially devastating occurrences, it reacts as would reasonable employers within its own market”
  • noting the Department of Labor’s guidance that the UBC defense “involves a highly factual inquiry to be assessed on a case by case basis”
  • noting employer bears burden of 17 showing existence of conditions giving rise to an exception
  • the 8th Circuit found that “the exception for unforeseeable business circumstances shields [the employer] from liability under the WARN Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.