· 7/22/2005
Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.
Citations
- 387 F. Supp. 2d 794
- 2005 WL 6200338
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15718
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- excluding an expert opinion that calculated lost profits with reference to eight existing businesses because those businesses were incomparable to plaintiff’s business, rendering the opinion “unreliable and speculative”
- excluding an expert opinion that calculated lost profits with reference to eight existing businesses because those businesses were incomparable to plaintiff’s business, rendering the opinion “unreliable and speculative”
- “Expert opinions that are contrary to law are inadmissible.” (citations omitted)
- “Expert opinions that are contrary to law are inadmissible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cole
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.