Skip to main content
· 7/22/2005

Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.

Citations

  • 387 F. Supp. 2d 794
  • 2005 WL 6200338
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding an expert opinion that calculated lost profits with reference to eight existing businesses because those businesses were incomparable to plaintiff’s business, rendering the opinion “unreliable and speculative”
  • excluding an expert opinion that calculated lost profits with reference to eight existing businesses because those businesses were incomparable to plaintiff’s business, rendering the opinion “unreliable and speculative”
  • “Expert opinions that are contrary to law are inadmissible.” (citations omitted)
  • “Expert opinions that are contrary to law are inadmissible.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.