Skip to main content
· 7/28/1999

Loeckle v. State Farm Automobile Insurance

Citations

  • 59 F. Supp. 2d 838
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12593
  • 1999 WL 615237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs affidavit failed to fall within the exception stated in [Camfield Tires, Inc. v. Michelin Tire Corp., 719 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir.1983
  • finding that the plaintiffs deposition testimony does not denote confusion on her part
  • dismissing one of named defendants for lack of employee- employer relationship
  • dismissing one of named defendants for lack of employee-employer relationship
  • extending federal-statute requirement of employee status to ICRA claim
  • dismissing one of named defendants for lack of employee-employer relationship

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.