Loeb v. US Dept. of Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding disclaimer despite plaintiffs argument that she did not remember seeing any “Conditions of Tour”
• tour operator not hable for fall which occurred on premises of lodge which was not owned, operated or controlled by operator
• “The courts have properly reasoned that where tour companies are not owners or occupiers of property where plaintiffs are injured, the tour operator owes no duty to tour members to inform them of the possible hazardous conditions which may exist on the property of others[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).