Loe v. Town of Thomaston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming entry of summary judgment for defendants on the plaintiff's invasion of privacy claim where the plaintiff presented no evidence that \the defendants physically invaded premises that she occupied for the purposes of seclusion\
• claim for intrusion upon physical or mental solitude requires “a physical intrusion upon premises occupied privately by a plaintiff for purposes of seclusion”
• disclosure of confidential information concerning circumstances of plaintiff’s separation from employment insufficient to support ITED claim
• “Under the parol evidence rule a binding partially integrated agreement discharges prior agreements to the extent that it is inconsistent with them”
• oral promise to keep settlement agreement confidential inconsistent with written release and thus unenforceable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).