LoDuca, J. v. McGinley, T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that discriminatory employment practices are cognizable under Title IX
• recognizing the need to “accord [Title IX] a sweep as broad as its language” (quotation omitted)
• concluding that Congress intended Title IX to prohibit employment discrimination
• holding that Title IX authorized the Department of Health, Education and Welfare to issue, and to enforce through the withholding of funding, regulations which prohibited federally funded education programs from discriminating on the basis of gender with respect to employment
• directing that Title IX must be accorded “a sweep as broad as its language”
• directing that Title IX must be accorded \a sweep as broad as its language\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).