Skip to main content
· 12/20/1985

Lodge v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District

Citations

  • 486 N.E.2d 764
  • 21 Mass. App. Ct. 277
  • 1985 Mass. App. LEXIS 2031

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \Presentment is a statutory condition precedent to recovery under c. 258” and designating \the Attorney General [as] the proper party for presentment of a claim against a district attorney under c. 258, § 4”
  • “[T]he office of the district attorney for the Suffolk district is more properly denominated a State 'agency' .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Greaney, Perretta, Kass

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.