Loden v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether person is in custody for Miranda purposes is mixed question of law and fact, and trial court’s determination on this issue will not be disturbed unless clearly erroneous
• “The issue of whether one is in custody for Miranda purposes is a mixed question of law and fact, and the trial court’s determination will not be disturbed unless it is clearly erroneous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hammond
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-03· cited 15×
• McDevitt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-06-25· cited 6×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-01· cited 6×
• Clark v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-02-07· cited 6×
• Doyle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-18· cited 6×
• Grodhaus v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-09-11· cited 5×
• Bramlett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-02-25· cited 3×
• Gaines v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-04-24· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Harper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-04-26· cited 25×
• State v. Pierce
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-03-12· cited 21×
• Polizzotto v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-09-10· cited 13×
• Harmon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-12-27· cited 6×