Skip to main content
· 5/15/1981

Loctite Corporation v. Fel-Pro, Inc. And Felt Products Mfg. Co.

Citations

  • 667 F.2d 577
  • 213 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 905
  • 33 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 145
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 13243

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming a finding of exceptional ease where patentee initiated suit with unconfirmed data to support its infringement claim, refused to produce any test results, and was proven to have conducted unreliable and tainted tests
  • rejecting appellant’s argument that a due process violation occurred in the form of a “sua sponte” dismissal because the appellant had an “opportunity to be heard” in the form of a motion to reconsider
  • no documentation of community billing rates

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swygert, Wood, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.