· 4/30/2009
Lockwood v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton
Citations
- 173 Cal. App. 4th 675
- 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d 220
- 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding federal courts possessed exclusive Section 1338 jurisdiction over state law claims stemming from opposing attorney's alleged action in obtaining patent reexamination
- holding federal courts possessed exclusive Section 1338 jurisdiction over state law claims stemming from opposing attorney's alleged action in obtaining patent reexamination
- holding federal courts possessed exclusive Section 1338 jurisdiction over state law claims stemming from opposing attorney’s alleged action in obtaining patent reexamination
- holding federal courts possessed exclusive Section 1338 jurisdiction over state law claims stemming from opposing attorney’s alleged action in obtaining patent reexamination
- “we hold that [plaintiffs] complaint, which seeks to regulate the conduct of attorneys appearing before the USPTO and requires resolution of substantial issues of patent law, is subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the federal courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willhite
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.