Lockridge, Ricky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court should “consider[ ] the disfiguring and impairing quality of the bodily injury as it was inflicted on a complainant by an offender”
• observing that “serious bodily injury may be established without a physician’s testimony when the injury and its effects are obvious”
• observing that “serious bodily injury may be established without a physician’s testimony when the injury and its effects are obvious”
• explaining that because reviewing court determined that evidence was sufficient to establish one type of serious bodily injury, it “need not address the second alternative”
• discussing Brown v. State, 605 S.W.2d 572, 575 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980), involving whether a broken and deformed nose could qualify as “serious permanent disfigurement”
• disavowing the portion of Moore that considered whether a victim had a substantial risk of death after taking into consideration the effects of medical treatment on the injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).