Skip to main content
· 11/17/1975

Lockman v. Connecticut

Citations

  • 423 U.S. 991
  • 96 S. Ct. 403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \There is no ambiguity in the wording of the statute.\
  • “There is no ambiguity in the wording of the statute.”
  • remanding for recalculation of the amount
  • remanding for recalculation of the amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.