Skip to main content
· 12/20/1996

Locklin v. Duka

Citations

  • 929 P.2d 930
  • 112 Nev. 1489
  • 1996 Nev. LEXIS 159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the termination of a guardianship that the parent previously consented to because there was no evidence to rebut the parental preference
  • considering the likely degree of stability and security in the child's future with the parent as part of the child's interests
  • providing factors for determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist to rebut the parental preference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.