· 12/20/1996
Locklin v. Duka
Citations
- 929 P.2d 930
- 112 Nev. 1489
- 1996 Nev. LEXIS 159
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the termination of a guardianship that the parent previously consented to because there was no evidence to rebut the parental preference
- considering the likely degree of stability and security in the child's future with the parent as part of the child's interests
- providing factors for determining whether extraordinary circumstances exist to rebut the parental preference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.