Skip to main content

Lockett v. State

Citations

  • 656 So. 2d 68
  • 1995 WL 215553

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claims challenging a confession are subject to the UPCCRA’s procedural bars
  • holding that claims challenging a confession are subject to the UPCCRA’s procedural bars

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dan M. Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.