Skip to main content
· 7/27/2023

Lockett v. Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the Federal right extends to all suits \whatever may be the peculiar form which they may assume to settle legal rights\
  • discussing the unavailability of appellate jurisdiction over the denial of a new trial, which would have required reexamination of the jury's factual findings
  • reading federal statute to limit appellate review of jury verdict and thus to preserve Seventh Amendment rights
  • describing admiralty as “a mixture of public law, and of maritime law and equity”
  • neither admiralty nor equity cases were suits in law within the Seventh Amendment jury provision
  • neither admiralty nor equity cases were suits in law within the Seventh Amendment jury provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Carl J. Nichols

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.