Locke v. Warner Bros., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Merely because Warner paid Locke the guaranteed compensation under the Agreement does not establish Warner fulfilled its contractual obligation.”
• “The above evidence raises a triable issue of material fact as to whether Warner breached its contract with Locke by categorically refusing to work with her, irrespective of the merits of her proposals.”
• “[T]he issue of fraudulent intent is one for the trier of fact.”
• “[T]he value in the subject development deal was not merely the guaranteed payments under the agreement, but also the opportunity to direct and produce films and earn additional sums, and most importantly, the opportunity to promote and enhance a career.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).