Locke v. United States Trustee (In Re Locke)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Schieber v. Hooper (In re Hooper), 112 B.R. 1009 (9th Cir. BAP 1990)
• creditor lost valuable collection right where landlord did not call first letter of credit and debtor had fraudulently induced creditor to issue second letter of credit in favor of the landlord
• “There is no meaningful distinction between the determination of liability and damages for the purpose of dischargeability, and the determination of liability and damages for the purpose of allowing or disallowing an unliquidated and disputed proof of claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).