Skip to main content
· 4/7/1966

Locke v. Henry

Citations

  • 273 Minn. 491
  • 141 N.W.2d 736
  • 1966 Minn. LEXIS 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[w]here the disregard for legislative mandates amounts to more than technical irregularity substantial compliance has not been achieved” (emphasis added)
  • pre-LaMere cases also noting the substantial/technical error distinction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.