Locke v. Baenen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of motion to amend complaint where, among other reasons, defendants would have had to engage in substantial additional discovery
• affirming a finding that a class of 29 members insufficient for class certi- fication
• reversing grant of summary judgment and reasoning that a reasonable trier of fact could find jail policy excessive given the need to balance the counterweight of plaintiffs’ dignity interests, even if policy turned out to be rationally related to a legitimate interest
• “While there is no magic number that applies to every case, a forty-member class is often regarded as sufficient to meet the numerosity requirement.”
• “While there is no magic number that applies to every case, a forty-member class is often regarded as sufficient to meet the numerosity requirement.”
• “While there is no magic number that applies to every case, a forty–member class is often regarded as sufficient to meet the numerosity requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).