Skip to main content
· 2/11/2004

Lockaby v. State

Citations

  • 594 S.E.2d 729
  • 265 Ga. App. 527
  • 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 660
  • 2004 Ga. App. LEXIS 174

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the purpose of OCGA § 17-8-57 is to prevent the jury from being improperly influenced by the trial judge
  • noting that the purpose of OCGA § 17-8- 57 is to prevent the jury from being improperly influenced by the trial court judge
  • “ ‘the purpose of OCGA § 17-8-57 is to prevent the jury from being influenced’ ”
  • no error where trial court admonished defense counsel for asking defense witnesses leading questions on direct examination
  • trial court did not err by allowing state to question defendant about any prior positive drug screens to impeach his unsolicited assertion that the drug screen that was the basis of his prosecution was his only positive drug screen
  • “Where a trial judge is alleged to have made a prejudicial remark during the course of the trial in violation of such Code section, absent plain error, an objection or motion for mistrial must he made in order to preserve the issue for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eldridge, Ruffin, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.