Skip to main content
· 3/12/2004

Locascio v. Imports Unlimited, Inc.

Citations

  • 309 F. Supp. 2d 267
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4297
  • 2004 WL 546853

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that requiring the intent to defraud element to pertain to the mileage complies with Congress’ intent in passing the Odometer Act
  • denying relief under the Act when defendant failed to provide plaintiff with the title because plaintiff “has not shown that the defendant intended to defraud her-or that she was ever misinformed-about the mileage of the vehicle she purchased.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Underhill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.