· 3/12/2004
Locascio v. Imports Unlimited, Inc.
Citations
- 309 F. Supp. 2d 267
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4297
- 2004 WL 546853
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- emphasizing that requiring the intent to defraud element to pertain to the mileage complies with Congress’ intent in passing the Odometer Act
- denying relief under the Act when defendant failed to provide plaintiff with the title because plaintiff “has not shown that the defendant intended to defraud her-or that she was ever misinformed-about the mileage of the vehicle she purchased.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Underhill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.