Local Union No. 5 of the Sheet Metal Workers' International Association v. Mahoning and Trumbull County Building Trades Welfare Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• speculating that an eligibility standard could violate the \sole and exclusive benefit\ requirement without being arbitrary and capricious
• speculating that an eligibility standard could violate the “sole and exclusive benefit” requirement without being arbitrary and capricious
• amendment resulted in loss of coverage based on employer prepayments and an employee’s “hour bank”
• arbitrary and capricious standard might not independently resolve review of trustee decision challenged as violative of statutory “sole & exclusive benefit,” 29 U.S.C. § 186(c)(5), requirement
• § 302 may also prohibit certain provisions which are not arbitrary and capricious
• § 302 may also prohibit certain provisions which are not arbitrary and capricious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).