Local Union 7107, United Mine Workers of America, District 28 v. Clinchfield Coal Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \[f]anciful inferences and bald speculations\ should not be considered
• “Fanciful inferences and bald speculations of the sort no rational trier of fact would draw or engage in at trial need not be drawn or engaged in at summary judgment.”
• “Fanciful inferences and bald speculations of the sort no rational trier of fact would draw or engage in at trial need not be drawn or engaged in at summary judgment.”
• “Because the WARN Act is remedial legislation, its exceptions are to be construed narrowly.”
• despite ongoing contractual haggles with primary purchaser of defendant’s coal, defendant could not foresee sixty days in advance that purchaser would offer low-ball purchase price that was economically impossible for Defendant to accept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).