Skip to main content
· 12/31/1959

Local No. 520, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Glendale Manufacturing Co.

Citations

  • 179 F. Supp. 222
  • 45 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2985
  • 1959 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “considerations of trustworthiness and credibility” in assessing adequacy of representation “are not without limitation, however, but instead are restricted to their relevance to issues in the litigation.”
  • collecting cases that “acknowledged the ability to consider motions to disqualify, remove, withdraw, substitute, and add lead plaintiffs throughout the litigation of a securities class action.”
  • movant failed to ensure that the complaint and lead plaintiff motion were filed by the entity that actually purchased shares during the class period
  • “The plain language of the statute precludes consideration of a financial loss asserted for the first time in a complaint, or any other pleading, for that matter, filed after the sixty (60
  • in slightly different context, holding that “since all putative class members were given notice of the opportunity to move for appointment as lead plaintiff by the original motion, there [was] no need for the Court to re-open the process by ordering a new notice and motion period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warlick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.