Local 1-369, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union AFL-CIO v. Chevron Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that transferring an employee at the same salary to \some wretched backwater\ is \clearly\ actionable in a retaliation claim
• stating that transferring an employee at the same salary to “some wretched backwater” is “clearly” actionable in a retaliation claim
• requiring that under § 510, a plaintiff must produce evidence indicating a causal connection between a defendant’s challenged action and its interference with plaintiff’s ability to receive an identifiable benefit
• explaining that § 510 should be read “to mean any adverse actions”
• \[W]e believe that the words describing prohibited conduct partake of a collective meaning that is broader than might be found in the dictionary definition of any one of them.\
• \[I]t is ... appropriate to view 'employment relationship' as an illustrative but non-exclusive description of a set of rights that are protected by [ERISA] § 510 ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).