· 10/23/1958
Lobo & Co. v. Contreras
Citations
- 6 A.D.2d 1037
- 181 N.Y.S.2d 758
- 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4532
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The motion court correctly ruled that New York law governs plaintiff’s veil-piercing claim . . . .”
- “The motion court correctly ruled that New York law governs plaintiff’s veil-piercing claim . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.