Lobdell v. Leichtenberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appointment was required for allegation that the sole access along a creek had become dangerous
• stating that, while mere inconvenience in the use of an existing road is not enough, a road of limited privilege, that is extremely difficult and burdensome in its use, warrants the appropriation of another more convenient course.
• “The crux of this appeal, therefore, is to determine whether she has pled sufficient facts to warrant the appointment of a board of viewers, who will then determine whether a private road is ‘necessary.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).