Lo v. Honda Motor Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding due diligence a question of fact for the jury 2 where a defective product presented as another facially logical explanation for 3 plaintiff’s injuries rather than medical malpractice
• whether plaintiff made sufficient inquiries into possibility of medical malpractice was question for trier of fact where \another facially logical explanation\ for injury existed and multiple doctors implied on numerous occasions that \condition could not have been prevented\
• where no physician prior to the seventh physician consulted made any connection between the plaintiff’s injury and the defendants’ conduct, triable issue whether plaintiff reasonably did not discover that defendants’ alleged medical malpractice may have been source of injury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).