Lm, Guardian on Behalf of Km, a Minor v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although the court did not reach the question in this case, the plaintiff was unlikely to have been able to establish any element necessary to show a voluntary undertaking
• noting Illinois has adopted sections 323 and 324 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts
• noting Illinois has adopted sections 323 and 324 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts
• “Illinois recognizes an affirmative duty of care independent of a special relationship … where a voluntary undertaking is shown.”
• “[A] voluntary undertaking is just that— voluntary—and as such, the scope of the duty that is assumed is limited to the extent of the undertaking.”
• “[A] voluntary undertaking is just that— voluntary—and as such, the scope of the duty that is assumed is limited to the extent of the undertaking.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).