Skip to main content
· 7/16/2009

Lloyds Underwriters v. NETTERSTROM

Citations

  • 17 So. 3d 732
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9709
  • 2009 WL 2048915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the McCarran–Ferguson Act applies only to arbitration agreements within the United States and that it has no effect on an international arbitration agreement that is governed by the Convention.”
  • [T]he McCarran–Ferguson Act applies only to arbitration agreements within the United States and that it has no effect on an international arbitration agreement that is governed by the Convention.”
  • [T]he McCarran–Ferguson Act applies only to arbitration agreements within the United States and that it has no effect on an international arbitration agreement that is governed by the Convention.”
  • “[W]here the terms can be reconciled, the clear language of the contract controls.”
  • “The Federal Arbitration Act must give way to contrary provisions of state laws regulating the business of insurance but, to the extent that the Act incorporates an agreement the United States made with other nations, it prevails over state laws.”
  • “The Federal Arbitration Act must give way to contrary provisions of state laws regulating the business of insurance but, to the extent that the Act incorporates an agreement the United States made with other nations, it prevails over state laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Padovano, Barfield, Webster

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.