· 6/15/2001
Federal Case
Citations
- 255 F.3d 683
- 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9199
- 2001 Daily Journal DAR 9199
- 167 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2353
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 19157
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the plaintiffs claim itself is the “touchstone” for preemption analysis
- “Because a CBA cannot validly sanction illegal action, we hold the terms of the CBA were irrelevant to plaintiffs’ claim.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.