Skip to main content
· 1/17/1972

Lloyd v. Third Judicial District Court in Salt Lake County

Citations

  • 404 U.S. 1035
  • 92 S. Ct. 717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a Rule 68 judgment is a particular type of consent judgment
  • stating that an offer of judgment is a particular type of consent judgment
  • noting that district courts may “modify, or even rescind, such interlocutory orders”
  • “District courts have inherent power to reconsider interlocutory orders and reopen any part of a case before entry of a final judgment.”
  • “District courts have inherent power to reconsider interlocutory orders and reopen any part of a case before entry of a final judgment.”
  • “District courts have inherent power to reconsider interlocutory orders and reopen any part of a case before entry of a final judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.